What only Intradiem holds, where the first measured proof gets earned, and the door customers take. Four threads to shape together.
The rating is commodity. Every vendor will quote it in October. Two things sit with us and nowhere else.
From the Queue Optimizer research interviews: 19 customer interviews, Apr to Aug 2025, sales site Knowledge Base.
"When stars ratings go down, we lose bonus payments which can amount to billions."
"With our government contracts for Medicaid and Medicare, we're specifically required to meet 80% within 30 seconds for our average speed of answer."
"If you don't make those metrics, you fail your scorecard and we can't do government business, that's worth billions of dollars to us."
"in our Medicare world, CMS requires that we manage our service levels to an 80% within 32 second target."
On service-level penalties: "I want to say we're over 10 million on the year."
Wording is as extracted from the interview PDFs, page references on file. Worth a read at source before any of it gets repeated outside this group.
Two kinds of CMS money run through these: the contract service-level standard (the 80 in 30 lines) and the Stars bonus (Humana's line). Worth keeping them as two separate ideas in anything we write.
Dynamic Delivery live for Medicare and Medicare Individual.
Medicare inside its combined member services profile.
Medicare tenant live.
Acquired Medicare book still moving onto the platform.
The Law 1 test holds: a competitor with the CMS file can't write either of these.
The quotes are internal research today and aren't in marketing's registry. Is there a version worth putting through marketing's clearance, blinded or named, or do they stay as the account teams' material?
The first measured result tying queue orchestration to a Medicare service measure is open ground. A Queue Optimizer pilot inside a customer's Medicare line is how Intradiem earns it.
"Queue Optimizer is new, so it has no numbers of its own yet. A pilot is how it earns them."
One supporting detail from Salesforce cases: Aetna and CVS already condition deliveries on "Cumulative Service Level by Queue" (cases from 2019 through the Jul 2026 Five9 migration). Queue-level service level is already a live input in those tenants, which gives a pilot its starting baseline. Internal until Kira Guzman confirms it.
Which customer Medicare line is the right first pilot, and what would Product want measured from day one so the result is writable?
Six of the top seven plans by our Stars value estimate are customers. They hear about Queue Optimizer through their account team, never a cold sequence, and the customer exclusion gate keeps them out of the net-new lane.
| Account | Salesforce owner | Success manager | Renewal (ChurnZero) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Humana | Steve Jackson | Christine Gotleib | to confirm |
| UnitedHealth | Mary Ann Chandler | Julia LaGrange | Dec 31 2026 |
| CVS / Aetna | Rachel DiBello (CVS), Mary Ann Chandler (Aetna) | Kira Guzman | Sep 15 2027 (CVS) |
| Elevance | Alex Bauer | DeAndra Scheidt | Oct 31 2026 |
| HCSC | Mary Ann Chandler | Amy Johnson | Oct 31 2026 |
Elevance and HCSC renew Oct 31, inside the CMS release window. The release gives both account teams a timely reason to be in the room with something new.
The same accounts are warm anchors for the back-office motion, so the account manager door carries the whole Dynamic Workforce Orchestration conversation, contact center and back office together.
For each account there's one question drafted for the success manager, ready to hand to Mary Ann, Alex, Steve and Rachel. Elevance stays unnamed in any outreach, per marketing's rule.
Does the customer piece go out as account-team content on release week alongside Track A, or does each account manager set the timing?
A UnitedHealthcare support case from Jun 15 2026 (case 331277) names a task called "CAHPS Training Change Champion Toolkit (CPX)", tied to a Complex Member Service group.
If it means UnitedHealthcare delivers CAHPS training to agents through the platform, that would put a customer's own Stars work on Intradiem in a way no one outside could know. It may also be nothing more than a task name.
The question for Julia: is that training delivered in idle time through the platform, how many agents get it, and does UnitedHealthcare track its effect?
Who's best placed to ask, Julia directly or through Mary Ann?